FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Dem Insiders: We Don't Need You, GOP


NationalJournalOnline.com / HOTLINE ON CALL

Dem Insiders: We Don't Need You, GOP

As Pres. Obama steps up his advocacy for health care reform, Dem pols are not sure that he needs bipartisan support to get it passed according to this week's National Journal Insiders Poll. Only 27 percent of the Dem Insiders said it was "very important" for Obama to secure a bipartisan package, while 47 percent said that was only "somewhat important" and another 22 percent said it was "not very important." Five percent said bipartisanship was "not important at all." With 59 votes in the Senate--and a filibuster proof 60 should Al Frankenbe seated after a recount of last year's MN race winds its way thorough the courts--and healthy majorities in the House, many Dem Insiders believe it is critical to focus on enacting an effective plan soon rather than wooing GOPers. "Far more important that it pass and that it works," said one Democratic Insider.

GOP Insiders predictably felt there was a greater imperative for Obama to bring GOP Members of Congress on board his health reform plan. Some 48 percent said it was "very important" that reform be bipartisan, followed by 22 percent who said it was "somewhat important" and 25 percent who said it was "not very important." Four percent said it was "not important at all." GOPers generally felt that attempting a massive overhaul of a key sector of the economy would necessarily require GOP support, if for no other reason than to provide some political insulation for Obama if his reforms don't work or cause political backlash. But even some GOP pols acknowledged that Obama's main task is getting something accomplished that works. "At the end of the day, all that will matter is whether it happened," said one Insider. "Style points may mean something around D.C., but precious little elsewhere."

For complete results of the Insiders Poll and all the verbatim comments click here.

(National Journal's JIM BARNES)

No comments:

Post a Comment