FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Delaware Is 15th State to Seek Overrule of Citizens United








Delaware Is 15th State to Seek Overrule of Citizens United

Eight in ten Americans oppose the Supreme Court ruling, which allows unlimited corporate spending on U.S. elections. Delaware is the latest state to demand that Congress step in and overturn it.

Document Actions
 
A protest about Citizens United in Spokane, Wash.
A protest about Citizens United in Spokane, Wash. Photo by Public Citizen.
Delaware became the 15th yesterday in a chorus of states that are calling on the U.S. House of Representatives to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which allows unlimited spending on elections by corporations, unions, and other groups. The case also represents an expansion of prior rulings that have reasoned that corporations are people and that corporate election spending qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment.
The 15 states that have issued resolutions or letters constitute nearly 80 million people, or just over a quarter of the U.S. population.
An increasing number of legislators, activists, and ordinary Americans believe the decision is so harmful that they’re building a movement at the state and local levels to pressure Congress to take action on the issue.

In Delaware’s case, eleven state senators and 24 state representatives signed a letter about the ruling, which was sent to both of Delaware’s senators as well as to U.S. Rep. John Carney (D–Del.)

“The United States of America’s elections should not be permitted to go to the highest bidder,” the letter reads, “and yet this is the risk that rises from the ashes of the Citizens United decision.”

Citizens-United-infographic-ByNey-555-2.jpg

The 15 states that have issued resolutions or letters constitute nearly 80 million people, or just over a quarter of the U.S. population. Meanwhile, another 16 states have introduced similar legislation, but haven’t passed it yet. Resolutions asking for the repeal of Citizens United have also been passed by about 500 municipalities, according to the Nation.

Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap is national director at the Move to Amend Coalition, which supports a constitutional amendment to strip corporations of their personhood rights. In a country where eight out of 10 people disagree with the Citizens United ruling, according to apoll by ABC News and the Washington Post, she says that resolutions and letters like Delaware’s are a sign that elected officials at the state level are listening to their constituents.

She remains skeptical that Congress will respond with action, but believes that pressure from the state and local levels may become so strong that Congress will be forced to act. Failing that, there’s another possibility: if two-thirds of the states in the U.S. call for a constitutional convention, they can go forward without Congress. Sopoci-Belknap says that simply raising the that possibility helps to ramp up pressure on the House.

“Congress doesn’t want to have a precedent of the states going around them,” she said.

Jonah Minkoff-Zern of the nonprofit Public Citizen argues that state-level resolutions are useful in themselves because they show members of Congress who want to overturn Citizens United that their constituents are behind them. He also points to the more than 125 active members of the House and Senate who have already called for a constitutional amendment, as well as President Barack Obama.

“If we’re down the road and we have 38 states that have called for an amendment and Congress still fails to act,” Minkoff-Zern says, then it might be time to consider possibilities such as constitutional conventions. “But we’re still a long way from there.”

Sopoci-Belknap says the Citizens United case has done a lot to raise awareness about corporate domination of American politics, but cautions against focusing exclusively on the ruling.

“Ultimately the amendment that passes needs to do more than overturn Citizens United,” she says. It needs to “make clear that corporations are not people and money is not speech.”

Some of the resolutions passed at the state level—such as Vermont’s and Illinois’s—have asked for wording that would do just that.

Watch for growing momentum around this issue in the coming months, as state lawmakers and groups like Move to Amend and Public Citizen work to turn up the heat on Congress.



James Trimarco wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas and practical actions. James is web editor at YES! You can follow him on Twitter at @JamesTrimarco.

Interested?
  • 9 Best Strategies to End Corporate Rule
    Corporate power is behind the politics of climate denial, Wall Street bailouts, union busting, and media consolidation, to name just a few. But real people have power, too. Here are some of our most successful strategies.
  • How Much is That Politician in the Window?
    Sarah van Gelder on a record season of corporate-funded political advertising and what it means for the 99 percent.




























No comments:

Post a Comment